Library of Congress Classification System
From LISWiki
A system for classifying books and other works devised for the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. which divides human knowledge into broad categories indicated by letters of the English alphabet, with further subdivisions indicated by decimal notation.
- Sample call number: PN 2035.H336 1991
In the United States, most research and academic libraries libraries use Library of Congress classification, while most school and public libraries use Dewey Decimal classification.
The Library of Congress Classification (LCC) is a system of library classification developed by the Library of Congress. It is used by most research and academic libraries in the U.S. and several other countries — most public libraries and small academic libraries continue to use the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). It is not to be confused with the Library of Congress Subject Headings or Library of Congress Control Number.
The classification was originally developed by Herbert Putnam with the advice of Charles Ammi Cutter in 1897 before he assumed the librarianship of Congress. It was influenced by Cutter Expansive Classification, DDC, and was designed for the use by the Library of Congress. The new system replaced a fixed location system developed by Thomas Jefferson. By the time of Putnam's departure from his post in 1939 all the classes except K (Law) and parts of B (Philosophy and Religion) were well developed. It has been criticized as lacking a sound theoretical basis; many of the classification decisions were driven by the particular practical needs of that library, rather than considerations of epistemological elegance.
Although it divides subjects into broad categories, it is essentially enumerative in nature. It provides a guide to the books actually in the library, not a classification of the world.
The National Library of Medicine classification system (NLM) uses unused letters W and QS-QZ. Some libraries use NLM in conjunction with LCC, eschewing LCC's R (Medicine).
Contents |
[edit] The system
| A | GENERAL WORKS | |
| B | PHILOSOPHY. PSYCHOLOGY. RELIGION | |
| C | AUXILIARY SCIENCES OF HISTORY | |
| D | HISTORY: GENERAL AND OLD WORLD | |
| E | HISTORY: AMERICA | |
| F | HISTORY: AMERICA | |
| G | GEOGRAPHY. ANTHROPOLOGY. RECREATION | |
| H | SOCIAL SCIENCES | |
| J | POLITICAL SCIENCE | |
| K | LAW | |
| L | EDUCATION | |
| M | MUSIC AND BOOKS ON MUSIC | |
| N | FINE ARTS | |
| P | LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE | |
| Q | SCIENCE | |
| R | MEDICINE | |
| S | AGRICULTURE | |
| T | TECHNOLOGY | |
| U | MILITARY SCIENCE | |
| V | NAVAL SCIENCE | |
| Z | BIBLIOGRAPHY. LIBRARY SCIENCE. INFORMATION RESOURCES (GENERAL) |
Letter classes I, O, W, X and Y are not in standard use.
[edit] See also
- Comparison of Dewey and Library of Congress subject classification
- Chinese Library Classification
- Harvard-Yenching Classification
[edit] External links
Template:Contents pages (footer box)de:Library of Congress Classification es:Clasificación de la Biblioteca del Congreso fr:Classification de la Bibliothèque du Congrès it:Classificazione della Library of Congress pl:Klasyfikacja Biblioteki Kongresu tr:LCC zh:美国国会图书馆图书分类法
[edit] Benefits
- Classification by discipline
- Economy of notation
- Alphabetically and geographically transparent
- Lots of room for growth
[edit] Weaknesses
- Piecemeal
- Few mnemonic devices
- No overall instructions
- No overall index
